Welcome to AGI Advance, Turing’s weekly briefing on AI breakthroughs, AGI research, and industry trends.
This week, we examine how labs are shifting toward more contextual, task-specific evaluation. We also unpack early evidence of agentic misalignment, explore emerging RL training regimes, and revisit what “understanding” really means inside a language model.
This week, we’ve been digging into the growing tension between leaderboard performance & real-world model reliability, and why LLM evaluation needs to evolve beyond static benchmarks.
Here’s what stood out:
In a world where eval inflation is real, model selection is shifting from “who’s on top?” to “who performs best for the task at hand?” And the teams asking that question are building faster, safer, and more grounded systems.
🗣️Mahesh Joshi, Head of Research
“We designed this benchmark to mirror how professionals actually think and solve problems—not how academic datasets quiz models.
Turing’s new VLM benchmark evaluates top models like Gemini 2.5 and Claude 3.7 on realistic, high-complexity tasks in STEM and business domains. The best model scored just 56.8%, and performance on the HARD subset dropped below 7%—underscoring why clean, task-relevant benchmarks are now essential to understanding true model capability.“
Turing will be at two major AI conferences in the coming months—join us to discuss the future of AGI:
If you’re attending, reach out—we’d love to connect and exchange insights!
Turing is leading the charge in bridging AI research with real-world applications. Subscribe to AGI Advance for weekly insights into breakthroughs, research, and industry shifts that matter.
Talk to one of our solutions architects and start innovating with AI-powered talent.