Welcome to AGI Advance, Turing’s weekly briefing on AI breakthroughs, AGI research, and industry trends.
This week, we dig into the often-invisible infrastructure behind RLHF, where the real leverage isn’t in model architecture, but in how reward models are trained, tuned, and trusted. From multi-dimensional reward mixtures to generative raters and dataset categorization into silver, gold, and platinum tiers, we’re surfacing what defines signal quality at the frontier. If you’re not calibrating your rubrics or tracking how feedback mutates across iterations, your pipeline may already be misaligned.
This week, we’re focused on the hidden infrastructure behind RLHF: reward models and the datasets that train them. Our findings underscored a core truth—alignment rises or falls on data quality.
Here are the takeaways:
The signal isn’t just about having “more data.” It’s about targeted sampling, calibrated rubrics, and disciplined labeling—the real differentiators between top-tier labs.
🗣️ Lilin Wang, Engineering Director:
“The majority of the difference between frontier models isn’t just architecture—it’s the labeling. Each lab’s rubrics and quality guidelines are their secret sauce. If you get that wrong, it’s garbage in, garbage out.”
Turing will be at two major AI conferences in the coming months—join us to discuss the future of AGI:
If you’re attending, reach out—we’d love to connect and exchange insights!
Turing is leading the charge in bridging AI research with real-world applications. Subscribe to AGI Advance for weekly insights into breakthroughs, research, and industry shifts that matter.
Talk to one of our solutions architects and start innovating with AI-powered talent.