Welcome to AGI Advance, Turing’s weekly briefing on AI breakthroughs, AGI research, and industry trends.
This week, we shift focus from generation to evaluation, specifically, how code review is emerging as a practical benchmark for agent reliability. We explore why even top agents struggle to catch regressions in real PRs, how perturbative training reduces multimodal hallucination without compute tradeoffs, and what it looks like when millions of human–LLM dyads evolve into a collective SuperBrain.
This week, we’re looking at how code review can act as a scalable eval signal, not just a productivity tool. Unlike full task execution or unit tests, review-based feedback is easier to collect, easier to interpret, and directly tied to developer intent.
Here’s what we’re seeing from recent experiments:
We think code review might be the most practical path to evaluating real-world coding agents, not by testing code generation, but by assessing whether agents can accurately identify incomplete, unsafe, or misaligned implementations.
🗣️ Jonathan Siddharth, Founder & CEO:
“We’re going to enter the agentic era where LLMs can amplify your productivity by 100x.
In this episode of B2BaCEO with Ashu Garg, Jonathan shares his vision for the agentic era, how we'll achieve artificial superintelligence, and why he believes that, within three years, even the CEO’s role will be automated.”
Turing will be at two major AI conferences in the coming months—join us to discuss the future of AGI:
If you’re attending, reach out—we’d love to connect and exchange insights!
Turing is leading the charge in bridging AI research with real-world applications. Subscribe to AGI Advance for weekly insights into breakthroughs, research, and industry shifts that matter.
Talk to one of our solutions architects and start innovating with AI-powered talent.