CompanyBench: Evaluating Frontier AI Agents On Real Operational Knowledge Tasks

Grounded in a real company

CompanyBench is built on five years of one fintech firm’s operational fabric: hundreds of examples of work that the firm’s employees have done over the course of its history while servicing customers - from quick the tasks of an analyst to strategic initiatives drawn out over the course of many months at the executive level. Every task is grounded in an actual historical work assignment at the company, like a Jira ticket or a Slack message. We require models to answer in a realistic manner: post a summary to Slack, file a Jira ticket, issue actionable decisions.

All data in CompanyBench is private and has never been made publicly available. All personally identifiable information is thoroughly and consistently scrubbed from the data before integration with our backend services. We obtained all data in the company’s lifecycle of five years, including tens of thousands of files, 148M database rows, and millions of Slack messages and Jira tickets.

We release results on 64 hard tasks attempted ten times each. In this setting, the strongest model, GPT-5.5, clears every required check 44.4% of the time. Claude Opus 4.8 came in second at 35.9% followed by Gemini 3.1 Pro at 18.3%, and Gemini 3.5 Flash rarely performed all the tasks correctly, usually neglecting to perform required write actions to Slack or Jira.

We identified four common modes across model runs, suffered by Claude, GPT, and Gemini models.

Neglecting to read the docs. Instead of searching for and reading the correct documentation on Slack or Confluence, the model makes assumptions about data sources by guessing the relevant tables, columns, and analysis logic. 

Chasing non-existent documents. When it cannot immediately ground a value, the model over-invests its search budget and hunts for authoritative documents that do not exist, then terminates with an empty or guessed answer.

Unrequested search filters. The model "improves" a deliberately simple SQL request by adding plausible extra filters, such as transfer-shape constraints, time-window anchors, or status codes that silently exclude legitimate rows.

Dropped write actions. Models repeatedly treat the numeric reply as the finish line and skip the mandated Slack and Jira deliverables, even in runs where the underlying analysis was correct.

We believe that the future of work is agentic, and models will be increasingly trusted with high stakes workflows. However frontier agents clearly still have a long way to go before being reliable autonomous partners for complex distributed knowledge work tasks. Simple errors, such as common sense failure cases and a lack of thoroughness handicaps model results in these complex settings, where models have to be deeply aware of contextual nuance. We introduce CompanyBench, a benchmark based on real enterprises, that addresses these gaps.

The full leaderboard, a task explorer with complete reasoning trajectories, and an overview of the dataset are all available on the dashboard. CompanyBench is a living benchmark, and we will keep evaluating new models as they arrive.